Quality of Cohort Studies Reporting Post the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement
نویسندگان
چکیده
The quality of reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals was investigated to indicate to what extent the items in the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist are addressed. Six top scientific medical journals with high impact factor were selected including New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, Lancet, British Medical Journal, Archive of Internal Medicine, and Canadian Medical Association Journal. Ten cohort studies published in 2010 were selected randomly from each journal. The percentage of items in the STROBE checklist that were addressed in each study was investigated. The total percentage of items addressed by these studies was 69.3 (95% confidence interval: 59.6 to 79.0). We concluded that reporting of cohort studies published in the most prestigious scientific medical journals is not clear enough yet. The reporting of other types of observational studies such as case-control and cross-sectional studies particularly those being published in less prestigious journals expected to be much more imprecise.
منابع مشابه
کیفیت گزارش مطالعات کوهورت پرستاری و مامایی براساس بیانیه STROBE
Background & Aim: Transparent and appropriate reporting of studies facilitates critical appraisal, application and combination of findings. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement, is a relatively new statement in order to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The present study aimed to assess the quality of reporting nu...
متن کاملمعرفی دستورالعمل ارتقاء گزارشدهی مطالعات مشاهدهای در اپیدمیولوژی
Background and Objective: Studies in the health sciences is comprised of observational and intervention. A major part of health sciences research has been allocated to the observational studies. Designing and doing studies based on scientific guidelines that include the entire process, leads to studies validation and also results can be generalized to the community. Thus, for standardizing ...
متن کاملبررسی کیفیت گزارش نتایج مطالعات کوهورت قبل از صدور بیانیه STROBE
Background & Objectives: Observational studies are not often reported in detail and clear enough, so that assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of these studies is not straightforward. To improve the reporting of observational studies, a checklist of items called ‘Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology’ (STROBE) was developed by some experts in October 2007. T...
متن کاملضرورت تجدید نظر در بیانیه استروب به منظور پوشش دادن مطالعه اکولوژیک
سخن سردبیر Editorial مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان دوره 13، آبان 1393، 654-653 ضرورت تجدید نظر در بیانیه استروب به منظور پوشش دادن مطالعه اکولوژیک The Necessity of Revising the STROBE Statement in Order to Cover Ecological Studies محسن رضائیان[1] M. Rezaeian در سخن سردبیری شماره شهریور سال 1392 مجله دانشگاه، خوانندگان، داوران ...
متن کاملStrengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology – nutritional epidemiology (STROBE‐nut): An extension of the STROBE statement†
Concerns have been raised about the quality of reporting in nutritional epidemiology. Research reporting guidelines such as the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement can improve quality of reporting in observational studies. Herein, we propose recommendations for reporting nutritional epidemiology and dietary assessment research by extending the...
متن کامل